Do I Not Deal With Angels 2.
ON 'WOMEN AND MEN'
[APOLOGIES, POST ONGOING/ YET TO COMPLETE]
We discover that we are men when we can look to a face and say “you”. In fact, the newborn looks for the face of the mother, as the child looks for the face of the parents, the lover looks for the face of the beloved, the disciple looks for the face of the teacher, the man looks for the face of God.
Gianfranco Amato
Sean Penn, gets the denominations in a twist, on Twitter. Evangelical Charismatic' Catholics, reached about 25% across Catholicism around the turn into-the-80s. How many, Fundie-type, Christians, laugh at Sean?
Yet..., Don't Know (The) History?
Or, assume/come, and go-vague, on the meaning of 'Evangelical'?
Dreamy and dozy, morphing it into an amorphous... 'Christian Denomination'?
Rosa Koire
Catherine Austin Fitts
[Names to Pictures on Pt. 1.
Owen Benjamin
Milo Yiannopoulos
Slavoj Zizek debates Jordan Peterson.
Ricky Gervais
Daphne Caruana Galizia
/ Daphne, October 18, 2017
Magnus Carlsen vs. Garry Kasparov
Chris Taylor
/ Nick Spero, March 16, 2018
James Tracy
Like many, I've an un-'conventional narrative of human history'. I consider some words prophetic. Involving that which goes beyond communication in the normal sphere of things. Somehow unearthing something in the hearer and this, correspondingly affects the 'unseen'. Our response to say, Orwell's 1984 and James Tracy's dismissal through this article/comments – can have, particular power. Not all incidents and/or words, speak to our times in such a way, but the connecting the two here – I believe – does.
:
What's key, is our response. And this infusing in us encouragement and hope, into necessary actions not see our world going, at least in-all, the obviously unwanted ways. Go all-'1984'. Somehow we're empowered to achieve this. Something-like, hopefully the opposite of a memory hole. What's hidden or oppressed is exposed in coming liberation etc. I appreciate this isn't saying a lot, I'm only highlighting; we can see 1984 as a where-we're going or, maybe or with even more faith, somehow – not. I thought to write. All together now, and all that. Thanks.
:
Ne'er about my bit, this is an enthralling post on the intellectual light-house – Memory Hole.
/ James and George, February 28, 2016
Brendon O'Connell
And if you’d to like to experience the cat among the birds on this, consider Brendon O'Connell talking with Nick Spero and the word is – Talpiot. Critics claim overstatement. Brendon goes head down and on, burning bridges with all but those who’ll join his chorus. How, not to make many friends but look for specific comrades.
/ Tap, August 16, 2017
What's a bigger info-communication need, than read, watch and engage across intellectual and religious/or-not divides? The more on Zionism, more we light the wider terrain.
:
The circle extended, to refute or rally-up. Or, for me, lots of as yet grey not B&W conclusions.
:
For example, can't say I'm not considerate of Mr. Isolate But Preserve -- Brendon O'Connell -- who's adamant it's all clear-as; Putin and Netanyahu with City Of London want a 'One Belt One Road'.
:
Regardless, in some aspects, how bi or tri-polar the brokers sift out: The threat of a), Won't -- moving into increasing cannot -- speak of the influence/power of Israel-first.
:
Leads to b), Bombs (or whatsoever not described by this) down on the masses from Jordan up to, suppose, the northern Caucasus?
:
And what of the Bear? Are they being offered a deal? Offering, or the offensive -- depending on Atlanticist leverage within? And so who sits at the table's head? At least in managing war plans.
:
At least, left to/run by, those perhaps, the final backroom elite.
/ Heads Or Tail (Who Is Leading The Wars) ?, September 28, 2017
Brendon as ballsy and articulate as they come. Bulls about disregarding those who don't join his chorus. Disparages. Fixed-eyed missionary against perceived web of lies.
/ Should Be Writing About Brendon, December 18, 2017
Wolfgang Halbig
/ Wolfgang Isn't A Nut, September 12, 2017
Anna Brees
Paul Craig Roberts
Louis Farrakhan and Alex Jones
Dr. Judith Curry
<<< TYPE DONE.
Rewind
Paul Craig Roberts, from, RT.
Britain’s Orwellian Police Urge Britains to Rat One Another Out for undefined “Extremist Views.”
An “extremist view” is one that differs from controlled explanations.
Holding unapproved opinions is becoming a crime. But “we have freedom and democracy.”
Crimes Of Empire/ Black Friday Massacre: What Really Happened in Paris?, November 17, 2015
HELRIC/ THE THIRD MAN
Power needs to destroy social relations, to create lonely, perfectly manipulable individuals. It even legitimized having to hide his face with a mask. However, how do you have a relationship with the other without seeing him in the face? The human face is the part of the body that must always be naked and that must not be hidden. It is no coincidence that in ancient Greece the slave was defined as faceless, therefore without dignity.
Gianfranco Amato
It's explained that all relationship require a little give and take. This is untrue. Any partnership demands that we give and give and give and at the last, as we flop into our graves exhausted, we are told that we didn't give enough.
― Quentin Crisp.
QC on how to become a virgin? Something, Jordan Peterson says about the appreciation of art, on Biblical Series I: Introduction to the Idea of God.
/ Sand And Glue, December 26, 2020
Not sure of the quote I'd read. A substitute, and smacker think:
Whatever it is that is you has this capacity to experience reality and to transform it, which is a very strange thing. You can conceptualize the future in your imagination, and then you can work and make that manifest—participate in the process of creation. That’s one way of thinking about it. That’s why I think Genesis 1 relates the idea that human beings are made in the image of the divine—men and women, which is interesting, because feminists are always criticizing Christianity as being inexorably patriarchal. Of course, they criticize everything like that, so it’s hardly a stroke of bloody brilliance. But I think it’s an absolute miracle that right at the beginning of the document it says straightforwardly, with no hesitation whatsoever, that the divine spark which we’re associating with the word, that brings forth Being, is manifest in men and women equally. That’s a very cool thing. You got to think, like I said, do you actually take that seriously? Well, what you got to ask is what happens if you don’t take it seriously, right? Read Dostoevsky’s Crime and Punishment. That’s the best investigation into that tactic that’s ever been produced.