Time to plug away. 2017 and re-start – more here, than there – postings. Expression for freedom, else feel a-hypo-crit. Write because, it’s a blessing can, and we’re under an onslaught not to.

Do something on..?

How about, whatever’s top of Drudge?

‘JIHAD COMES TO FORT LAUDERDALE?’.

Like all mainstream, rarely details over keep to an agenda. Having said this, Drudge is the one most-independent mainstream out there. Infecting conservatives with gentle laps of awoken info. This aggregating venture, genuinely manages to top the most influential, censorship-threatening poll.

Aggravates in barely reviled popularity, with headlines and thumbnail pictures. And this is/becomes news itself. Somewhat, sometimes, forcing US ‘national’ coverage.

You’d think there’d be a left-leaning version but there’s isn’t, maybe because the overall chattering set, are on their general behalf.

Of course the liberal/conservative mix and fight, is much of a circus, that only Trump and co could maybe and somewhat surprise, otherwise.

Headline talk in the T.V. type world, is loaded against accuracy. ‘Jihad’ may have, come to mean… a word synonymous with supposed/suspect violence, from supposed etc. Isis etc. But it’s lazy and pushy, knowing full well its broad use and meaning, is held in the vast majority by people with no intention of committing or condoning the use of violence. Those whose religion this word is from.

To my thought. About details and this:

T.V. drama, again and again, show cops; going way beyond reality in obsessing over clues and evidence, statements and forensic science. One the other night and a body found, been dead for years – teams going to extraordinary and utterly, unrealistic extent, to bring justice.

Now come to mass killings by Mr. Jihadist and no amount of glaring anomalies get a second look. There’s a handful or so of YouTubers, often in a tired and sarcastic mockery, stating the obvious.

Phone/bullet – stopped. Oh yeah?

This all. This me. Watching the confusion sow into us. Because, this is my conclusion: The anomalies about the anomalies, often increase suspicion and likely cover-up –yet– could be construed, as intentionally spinning the implausible.

Therefore, coming to think there’s a centralist contrive, to get us all wrapped up in a ball of confusion.

And believe, there are really only three main arguments against all false-flag or hoax based conspiracies; ‘They’ couldn’t organise/too disorganised, too many participators and no whistle-blowers and we’re not qualified to decide upon areas of specific expertise. Add to this, “there’s exceptions to rules”.

Can a mobile phone stop a bullet? Or a lap-top? Well they seem to? Told so?

Whose involved? How about, all and any of us that go… “ah well must be true because...” – and we fall back on these three arguments.

Until the likely v.soon, next ‘terrorist incident’ and unnecessary claims, which maybe tis a miracle, or maybe…

I’m confused.

Drudge